Re: Could regexp_matches be immutable? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Kevin Grittner
Subject Re: Could regexp_matches be immutable?
Date
Msg-id 4AD5F8EC020000250002B94A@gw.wicourts.gov
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Could regexp_matches be immutable?  (David Fetter <david@fetter.org>)
Responses Re: Could regexp_matches be immutable?  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
David Fetter <david@fetter.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 04:51:03PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Rod Taylor <rod.taylor@gmail.com> writes:
>> > I tried making a functional index based on an expression
>> > containing the 2 argument regexp_matches() function. Is there a
>> > reason why this function is not marked immutable instead of
>> > normal?
>> 
>> regex_flavor affects its result.
> 
> Speaking of which, can we see about deprecating and removing this
> GUC?
+1  It would seem to me to be more valuable to have the benefits of
IMMUTABLE than preserve pre-7.4 compatibility forever.
-Kevin


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: Could regexp_matches be immutable?
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Rejecting weak passwords