Tom Lane wrote:
> Hm, I've not compared the two versions of the patch, but what I was
> thinking was that I'd like to get the resultRelation stuff out of EState
> and have it *only* in the DML nodes. It sounds like you went in the
> other direction --- what was the reason for that?
I've taken a compromise of that in the writeable CTE code; the DML nodes
have the index to the start of their result relation array which is part
of estate->es_result_relations. This way the code that currently
depends on estate->es_result_relations works normally. Also, we set
estate->es_result_relation_info only during ExecInitDml(). I didn't
want to break that either. The "index to es_result_relations" is a bit
kludgy, but I didn't see any better ways to do this and wanted to move
on with the code and not be stuck in a single place for too long. But
I'm thinking that this should be part of the writeable CTE patch.
Regards,
Marko Tiikkaja
