Emmanuel,
> I think that this was the original idea but we should probably rollback
> the error logging if the command has been rolled back. It might be more
> consistent to use the same hi_options as the copy command. Any idea what
> would be best?
Well, if we're logging to a file, you wouldn't be *able* to roll them
back. Also, presumbly, if you abort a COPY because of errors, you
probably want to keep the errors around for later analysis. No?
--Josh Berkus
