Re: Rejecting weak passwords - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: Rejecting weak passwords
Date
Msg-id 4AC0C030.9080803@dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Rejecting weak passwords  ("Ing. Marcos L. Ortí­z Valmaseda"<mlortiz@uci.cu>)
Responses Re: Rejecting weak passwords
List pgsql-hackers

Ing. Marcos L. Ortí­z Valmaseda wrote: 
>>
>> My vote is for #3, if anything.
>>
>>
> You have to analyze all points before to do this. I vote too for the 
> third option, but you have to be clear that how do you ´ll check the 
> weakness of the password:
> 1- For example: the length should be greater that 6 char..
> 2- The password should be have  a combination fo numbers, letters and 
> others dots
>
> Things like that you have to think very well, or to do a question to 
> the list asking which are the best options.
>
> I think the same about the PAM and LDAP auth
>
>

I'm voting for #3 precisely so postgres doesn't have to think about it, 
and the module author will do all the work implementing whatever rules 
they want to enforce.

cheers

andrew


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Magnus Hagander
Date:
Subject: Re: Rejecting weak passwords
Next
From: Magnus Hagander
Date:
Subject: Re: Rejecting weak passwords