Re: generic copy options - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Emmanuel Cecchet
Subject Re: generic copy options
Date
Msg-id 4AB24B4C.8090404@asterdata.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: generic copy options  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: generic copy options
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> Emmanuel Cecchet <manu@asterdata.com> writes:
>   
>> Tom Lane wrote:
>>     
>>> psql has MORE need to support old syntax than the backend does, because
>>> it's supposed to work against old servers.
>>>
>>>       
>> Well, I wonder how many users just upgrade psql vs upgrade the server.
>>     
>
> We have established a project policy that psql backslash commands will
> support servers at least back to 7.4, and a great deal of work has
> already been expended in support of that goal.  It is not within the
> charter of this patch to ignore or redefine that policy.
>   
Does that mean that we can drop the 7.3 syntax or should we just keep it?
For future references, where can I find the various project policies?

Thanks
Emmanuel

-- 
Emmanuel Cecchet
Aster Data Systems
Web: http://www.asterdata.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Feedback on getting rid of VACUUM FULL
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Feedback on getting rid of VACUUM FULL