Re: Planner question - "bit" data types - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Brian Cox
Subject Re: Planner question - "bit" data types
Date
Msg-id 4AA5B1DD.4090805@ca.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Planner question - "bit" data types  (Karl Denninger <karl@denninger.net>)
List pgsql-performance
"pgsql-performance-owner@postgresql.org" wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 5, 2009 at 8:19 PM, Karl Denninger<karl@denninger.net> wrote:
>  > There was a previous thread and I referenced it. I don't have the
> other one
>  > in my email system any more to follow up to it.
>  >
>  > I give up; the attack-dog crowd has successfully driven me off.  Ciao.
>
> Perhaps I'm biased by knowing some of the people involved, but I don't
> think anyone on this thread has been anything but polite.
I use several online forums and this -- hands down -- is the best: not
only for politeness even when the information I provided was misleading
or the question I asked was, in retrospect, Duh? but also for 1) speed
of response, 2) breadth of ideas and 3) accuracy of information -- often
on complex issues with no simple solution from folk who probably have
more to do than sit around waiting for the next post. My thanks to the
knowledgeable people on this forum.

Brian


pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Planner question - "bit" data types
Next
From: Karl Denninger
Date:
Subject: Re: Planner question - "bit" data types