Re: \d+ for long view definitions? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Josh Berkus
Subject Re: \d+ for long view definitions?
Date
Msg-id 4A9D5A69.8090007@agliodbs.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: \d+ for long view definitions?  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Responses Re: \d+ for long view definitions?
List pgsql-hackers
On 8/31/09 1:13 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> I guess my premise is that if I use \d, I'm primarily interested in the
> column names and types.  The view definition is secondary.  If the view
> definition is a single line or uses a single table, it's interesting
> because it might describe something about the schema design, but if it's
> 20 lines it's an implementation detail.

I agree with Peter here.

-- 
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
www.pgexperts.com


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: remove flatfiles.c
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: remove flatfiles.c