Re: [Skytools-users] WAL Shipping + checkpoint - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Sébastien Lardière
Subject Re: [Skytools-users] WAL Shipping + checkpoint
Date
Msg-id 4A9B86E1.5000109@hi-media.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [Skytools-users] WAL Shipping + checkpoint  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>)
Responses Re: [Skytools-users] WAL Shipping + checkpoint  (Yaroslav Tykhiy <yar@barnet.com.au>)
List pgsql-general
On 28/08/2009 18:14, Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-08-28 at 17:54 +0200, Sébastien Lardière wrote:
>
>> Since this moment, the slave didn't make any checkpoint.
>>
>> Now, we know why. Thanks a lot !
>>
>> But how can i fix it ?
>>
> Current issue: Rebuild standby from base backup.
>
> Cause: Locate the bug in the Index AM that causes it.
>
> Symptom: Currently index AMs don't detect situation that index is
> corrupt so they keep trying to recover the index for ever, even though
> attempting to do so permanently prevents restartpoints. I would also
> like them to have a mechanism for marking index corrupt and then
> auto-rebuild them following recovery.
>

Thanks, I make a restore backup on the slave this morning, and It works !

Thanks a lot,

--
Sébastien Lardière



pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: nesfree
Date:
Subject: Re: Problem libpython2.3.so.1.0
Next
From: "Daniel Verite"
Date:
Subject: Re: Problem libpython2.3.so.1.0