On Oct 21, 2008, at 14:16, Tom Lane wrote:
> Well, we can't do that because it would clearly break too much
> existing
> code. '{}' has got to result in something you can successfully
> concatenate more elements to.
Right, that's what I was trying to day. Badly, I guess.
> But either the current behavior with
> a zero-dimension array, or a one-dimensional length-zero array would
> presumably work okay.
Right, that sounds right to me.
Thanks,
David
