Andres Freund wrote:
> On Monday 10 August 2009 14:39:22 Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>> Andres Freund wrote:
>>
>>> I produced/mailed a relaxng version for a a bit older version and I plan
>>> to refresh and document it once the format seems suitably stable. I am
>>> not sure it is yet. If yes, this should not take that long...
>>> (Relaxng because you easily can convert it into most other XML schema
>>> description languages)
>>>
>> I don't mind doing both, but I think one should be authoritative, and
>> whatever the relative technical merits are (please, let's not debate
>> that here) the fact after quite some years is that XML Schemas have much
>> more traction. See the thread that starts at
>> <http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/200804/msg00058.html>. For
>> example, Xerces-J supports XML Schemas natively.
>>
> I don't really mind which format gets choosen - I just had relaxng one
> already done.
> Do you plan to write a XML-Schema Schema? Just to avoid duplicated work...
>
>
>
I'll see what I can do.
cheers
andrew
