Kevin Grittner wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> wrote:
>
>
>> Excluding every database that has a composite/array-of
>> user-defined-type/enum type would be pretty nasty. After all, these
>> are features we boast of.
>>
>
> Any idea whether domains are an issue? I was thinking of trying this
> tool soon, and we don't seem to be using any of the problem features
> -- unless type issues include domains.
>
>
>
I don't believe that they are an issue. The issue arises only when a
catalog oid is used in the on-disk representation of a type. AFAIK the
on-disk representation of a domain is the same as its base type.
cheers
andrew
