Mark Kirkwood wrote:
> Jaime Casanova wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 3:38 AM, Mark
>> Kirkwood<markir@paradise.net.nz> wrote:
>>
>>> With respect to the sum of wait times being not very granular, yes -
>>> quite
>>> true. I was thinking it is useful to be able to answer the question
>>> 'where
>>> is my wait time being spent' - but it hides cases like the one you
>>> mention.
>>> What would you like to see? would max and min wait times be a useful
>>> addition, or are you thinking along different lines?
>>>
>>>
>>
>> track number of locks, sum of wait times, max(wait time).
>> but actually i started to think that the best is just make use of
>> log_lock_waits send the logs to csvlog and analyze there...
>>
>>
> Right - I'll look at adding max (at least) early next week.
>
>
>
>
Patch with max(wait time).
Still TODO
- amalgamate individual transaction lock waits
- redo (rather ugly) temporary pg_stat_lock_waits in a form more like
pg_locks
