Re: Review: Revise parallel pg_restore's scheduling heuristic - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Kevin Grittner
Subject Re: Review: Revise parallel pg_restore's scheduling heuristic
Date
Msg-id 4A6D8C1C0200002500028D89@gw.wicourts.gov
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Review: Revise parallel pg_restore's scheduling heuristic  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> wrote:
> Does your test case have lots of foreign keys?
488 of them.
There is some variation on individual tests, but the results look to
be "in the noise."  When I add them all up, the patch comes out
0.0036% slower -- but that is so far into the noise as to be
considered "no difference" in my book.
-Kevin


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: Review: Revise parallel pg_restore's scheduling heuristic
Next
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: proposal: support empty string as separator for string_to_array