Tom Lane wrote:
> I don't personally have a problem with just forcing use of our own
> erand48 on Cygwin; it's not a lot of code and it would make the behavior
> of that build more like the MSVC build. But it's curious that such a
> simple library function is seemingly broken on Cygwin ... especially
> when their random() and srandom() evidently work.
>
>
It appears on Googling a bit that the erand48() is buggy in that it
requires the seed to have been initialized with srand48() or it will
constantly return 0.0.
So I think just forcing use of ours is the safe way to go. It might have
been fixed since I installed Cygwin, although I can't find a reference
to that, and I don't feel like triangulating it anyway.
cheers
andrew
