git revisited - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject git revisited
Date
Msg-id 4A64D0DA.9030205@dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: WIP: Deferrable unique constraints  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: git revisited  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
[changing subject, as we seem to have done]

Tom Lane wrote:
> David Fetter <david@fetter.org> writes:
>   
>> On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 01:00:12PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>>     
>>> I might think about it when/if we move to git.
>>>       
>
>   
>> As far as you're concerned, what's blocking that?
>>     
>
> Lack of committer familiarity with git, lack of a bulletproof migration
> process, uncertainty about preferred multi-branch patching techniques,
> uncertainty about buildfarm integration, etc etc.  Do I really need to
> repeat the previous discussions to you?  AFAIR none of the open
> questions have gotten resolved with any clarity.
>
>             
>   

I have been derailed slightly by pressure of other work from making the 
buildfarm client git-capable. But it is still quite high on my TODO list.

I'm not sure where we got to with doing some surgery on the CVS repo so 
that we can replicate all the tags and branches properly. Has someone 
fully identified what needs to be fixed so we can have all the tags?


cheers

andrew


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] SE-PgSQL/tiny rev.2193
Next
From: Ron Mayer
Date:
Subject: Re: SE-PostgreSQL?