Tom Lane wrote:
> Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu> writes:
>
>> Really? That's not how I read it. I read it as the build process in
>> the contrib directory built these modules using the pgxs configuration
>> from his 8.3 install.
>>
>
> Hm, maybe, but it's not supposed to do that (and I would think we'd have
> noticed such a problem before --- surely most hackers have pre-existing
> installations of PG in their PATH when they build test versions).
> Anyway I'd like to have some hard data before speculating too much.
>
>
That's why I asked to see the make log. Maybe some environment setting
affected things?
cheers
andrew
