Re: Upgrading our minimum required flex version for 8.5 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: Upgrading our minimum required flex version for 8.5
Date
Msg-id 4A5A6D76.7030509@dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Upgrading our minimum required flex version for 8.5  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
Responses Re: Upgrading our minimum required flex version for 8.5  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers

Josh Berkus wrote:
>
>> This is ready to go except for changing the minimum flex version test
>> in configure (and associated documentation).  I see that a good-sized
>> fraction of the buildfarm is still on flex 2.5.4 and will therefore go
>> red when this goes in.  Should I hold off a bit longer, or is committing
>> the best way to get their attention?
>
> Oh, I didn't think about the Flex version.  That's going to be a far 
> more widespread problem.  OSX 10.5, for example, still ships with 
> 2.5.33.  I suspect that a *lot* of OSes won't have anything up-to-date.
>

That's the version Tom is proposing to make the minimum.

cheers

andrew


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Josh Berkus
Date:
Subject: Re: Upgrading our minimum required flex version for 8.5
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Upgrading our minimum required flex version for 8.5