Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote:
> in the future we might want to change from a fixed list of patch
> sections to a free list of tags, say. Then someone might alter the
> application backend, and we'd use that new version for the next
> commit fest at the time. What will that do to the data of old
> commit fests?
Certainly you see how trivial that conversion would be. If that were
the worst case anyone could even imagine, it would be a pretty strong
argument that the schema is more than good enough to proceed.
Do you see anything fundamentally wrong with the structure in terms
of long term goals?
-Kevin
