Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> I think it IS newest at the bottom, and I agree that that is how it
> should be.
It seems to be inconsistent. Probably because everything wound up
with the same date, the order is probably more-or-less random. What
are the chances that the date or timestamp of the corresponding wiki
modification could be put onto the patch and comment lines? (One
would hope that could be done with a script, rather than by hand....)
-Kevin
