Re: pre-proposal: permissions made easier - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: pre-proposal: permissions made easier
Date
Msg-id 4A47EE90.2060205@dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pre-proposal: permissions made easier  (David Fetter <david@fetter.org>)
Responses Re: pre-proposal: permissions made easier  (David Fetter <david@fetter.org>)
Re: pre-proposal: permissions made easier  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers

David Fetter wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 05:27:19PM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>   
>> David Fetter wrote:
>>     
>>>   
>>>       
>>>>  * Users who come from MySQL every once in a while, annoyed that
>>>>  we don't support "GRANT ... *" syntax.
>>>>     
>>>>         
>>> I'm missing what's wrong with a wild-card GRANT syntax for this
>>> case.
>>>       
>> Without a major change in the way we do permissions, it will not
>> work  prospectively.  We have no way ATM to store permissions for an
>> object  that does not currently exist.
>>     
>
> There have been previous discussions of prospective permissions
> changes.  Are we restarting them here?
>
>
>   

*shrug*

It's not on the TODO list. I recall it being raised from time to time 
but I certainly don't recall a consensus that it should be done, nor 
how, so if you're implying that such a thing is a settled decision I 
suspect you're not entirely correct. Of course, my memory has been known 
to have errors ...

cheers

andrew


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jeff Davis
Date:
Subject: Re: pre-proposal: permissions made easier
Next
From: David Fetter
Date:
Subject: Re: pre-proposal: permissions made easier