Tom Lane wrote:
> I wrote:
>> Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com> writes:
>>> Hmm, I see another small issue. We now keep track of the "minimum
>>> recovery point". Whenever a data page is flushed, we set minimum
>>> recovery point to the LSN of the page in XLogFlush(), instead of
>>> fsyncing WAL like we do in normal operation.
>
>> We would want the end-of-recovery checkpoint to act like it's not in
>> recovery anymore for this purpose, no?
>
> Actually, what in the world is the purpose of that code at all?
> I can't see a case where it would trigger that wouldn't be a result
> of data corruption rather than a real need to advance the min restart
> point.
Huh? The only other place where we advance minimum recovery point is
CreateRestartPoint() when we skip the restartpoint. The
UpdateMinRecoveryPoint() call in XLogFlush() is what we rely on.
--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
