Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>> Bruce Momjian wrote:
>>
>> + #
>> + # Structure/union pointers in function prototypes and definitions have an extra
>> + # space after the asterisk:
>> + #
>> + # void x(struct xxc * a);
>>
>>
>> I know we should not be driven by our tools, but is there a case for a
>> coding standard that requires use of a typedef name here?
>>
>
> We use things like struct timeval and struct tm ... I don't think we
> should be creating typedefs for those, so it would be good to find a
> more general solution.
>
>
Good point.
cheers
andrew
