Re: User-facing aspects of serializable transactions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Kevin Grittner
Subject Re: User-facing aspects of serializable transactions
Date
Msg-id 4A23F72E.EE98.0025.1@wicourts.gov
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: User-facing aspects of serializable transactions  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> wrote:
> This approach allowed MSSQL to "clean up" on TPCE; to date their 
> performance on that benchmark is so much better than anyone else
> nobody else wants to publish.
Since they use a "compatibility level" setting to control whether a
request for a serializable transaction gives you snapshot isolation or
a true serializable transaction, you have to be careful interpreting
results like that.  Are you sure which one they used for this
benchmark?
-Kevin


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Suggested TODO: allow ALTERing of typemods without heap/index rebuild
Next
From: Zdenek Kotala
Date:
Subject: Re: list_head naming conflict gcc 4.2/perl/solaris