Re: pg_standby -l might destory the archived file - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Heikki Linnakangas
Subject Re: pg_standby -l might destory the archived file
Date
Msg-id 4A23EBF9.6000800@enterprisedb.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_standby -l might destory the archived file  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: pg_standby -l might destory the archived file
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> writes:
>> pg_standby can use ln command to restore an archived file,
>> which might destroy the archived file as follows.
> 
> Does it matter?  pg_standby's source area wouldn't normally be an
> "archive" in the real sense of the word, it's just a temporary staging
> area between master and slave.  (If it were being used as a real
> archive, keeping it on the same disk as the live slave seems pretty
> foolish anyway, so the case wouldn't arise.)

It seems perfectly sane to source pg_standby directly from the archive 
to me. And we're talking about symbolic linking, so the archive 
directory might well be on an NFS mount.

(I haven't looked at the issue yet)

--   Heikki Linnakangas  EnterpriseDB   http://www.enterprisedb.com


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_standby -l might destory the archived file
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_migrator and an 8.3-compatible tsvector data type