Re: User-facing aspects of serializable transactions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Kevin Grittner
Subject Re: User-facing aspects of serializable transactions
Date
Msg-id 4A23D44E.EE98.0025.1@wicourts.gov
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: User-facing aspects of serializable transactions  (Greg Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Greg Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com> wrote: 
> But it's certainly insufficient in an OLAP or DSS environment where
> transactions can take hours. If you can never know for sure that
> you've written your transaction safely and it might randomly fail
> and need to be retried any given day due to internal implementation
> issues you can't predict then I would call the system just broken.
I absolutely guarantee that it means that a transaction like that
should not be run at the SERIALIZABLE transaction isolation level
without some other protection.  I don't know that I would say the
system is broken when that's true; it seems to me more a matter of
having a tool in you tookbox which isn't the right one for every job.
The question is, is it an unacceptably risky foot-gun?
-Kevin


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: User-facing aspects of serializable transactions
Next
From: "Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
Subject: Re: It's June 1; do you know where your release is?