Re: pg_class and enum types - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Gevik Babakhani
Subject Re: pg_class and enum types
Date
Msg-id 4A19BCF8.50102@xs4all.nl
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_class and enum types  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>
> Gevik Babakhani wrote:
>> I was wondering why there is no pg_class record for the enum types. 
>> Do we treat the enum types differently?
>>
>
> Why do you think we should? What would the record look like?
>
> cheers
>
> andrew
I am not implying whether we  should or we should  not.  I was just  
looking  for the  logic behind it.
Re-reading what I just wrote with your reply gives me hint.

Thanx.

-- 
Regards,
Gevik



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: pull raw text of a message by message-id
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_class and enum types