question about pg_proc - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Gevik Babakhani
Subject question about pg_proc
Date
Msg-id 4A172936.80709@xs4all.nl
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: question about pg_proc  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Is there a historical reason why we have a "proargtypes" and a 
"proallargtypes"?
It seems that "proallargtypes" is only set when out parameters exist.
Could someone clarify this please?

Regards,
Gevik.


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Zdenek Kotala
Date:
Subject: [PATCH] Compiler warning cleanup
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: RFD: Discarded tuple count for SeqScan nodes in EXPLAIN ANALYZE