Re: raid10 hard disk choice

From: Robert Schnabel
Subject: Re: raid10 hard disk choice
Date: ,
Msg-id: 4A16E023.1060800@missouri.edu
(view: Whole thread, Raw)
In response to: Re: raid10 hard disk choice  (Greg Smith)
List: pgsql-performance

Tree view

raid10 hard disk choice  (Linos, )
 Re: raid10 hard disk choice  (Matthew Wakeling, )
  Re: raid10 hard disk choice  (Robert Schnabel, )
   Re: raid10 hard disk choice  (Scott Marlowe, )
   Re: raid10 hard disk choice  (Greg Smith, )
    Re: raid10 hard disk choice  (Robert Schnabel, )
     Re: raid10 hard disk choice  (Greg Smith, )
      Re: raid10 hard disk choice  (Scott Marlowe, )
       Re: raid10 hard disk choice  (Greg Smith, )
        Re: raid10 hard disk choice  (Robert Schnabel, )
  Re: raid10 hard disk choice  (Craig James, )
  Re: raid10 hard disk choice  (Robert Haas, )
   Re: raid10 hard disk choice  (Scott Marlowe, )
    Re: raid10 hard disk choice  (Scott Carey, )
    Re: raid10 hard disk choice  (Robert Haas, )
     Re: raid10 hard disk choice  (Scott Carey, )
    Re: raid10 hard disk choice  (Greg Smith, )
 Re: raid10 hard disk choice  (Merlin Moncure, )
  Re: raid10 hard disk choice  ("Joshua D. Drake", )
 Re: raid10 hard disk choice  (Linos, )

Greg Smith wrote:
> On Fri, 22 May 2009, Scott Marlowe wrote:
>
>> It's much less common to see such a change in server class drives
>
> This is a good point, and I just updated
> http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/SCSI_vs._IDE/SATA_Disks with a section
> about this topic (the last one under "ATA Disks").
And I can confirm that point because the 1TB SAS drives (ST31000640SS) I
just received to replace all the 1.5TB drives have the same firmware as
the ones I purchased back in October.  60% more $$, 50% less capacity...
but they work :-)  Lesson learned.


pgsql-performance by date:

From: David Blewett
Date:
Subject: Re: Bad Plan for Questionnaire-Type Query
From: Frank Joerdens
Date:
Subject: Re: Full statement logging problematic on larger machines?