Tom Lane wrote:
> Well, here's our problem it would seem: the planner is estimating the IN
> clause to match 317227 rows, rather than the actual 2522. That's
> naturally going to bias it against choosing an indexscan. You need to
> get that estimate closer before there's going to be much chance of
> choosing the right plan.
>
>> What do you mean with larger statistics target?
>
> See ALTER TABLE SET STATISTICS, or just change default_statistics_target
> and re-ANALYZE.
Thanks, that definitly looks like a starting point. I will test it and
post my results. Btw. what happens if the estimation would be to low?
