Re: windows doesn't notice backend death - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: windows doesn't notice backend death
Date
Msg-id 49FCB361.9070305@dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: windows doesn't notice backend death  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: windows doesn't notice backend death  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
>   
>> ... I killed a backend using the task manager, and 
>> the postmaster never noticed.
>>     
>
> Ick.  Is it possible that the postmaster did get a report, but thought
> it was normal session termination?  If so, how could we distinguish?
>
>     
>   

If that were the case then it would not have the dead process still 
listed as a live backend, ISTM, which it does.

cheers

andrew


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: windows doesn't notice backend death
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: windows doesn't notice backend death