Re: [PATCH] unalias of ACL_SELECT_FOR_UPDATE - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Heikki Linnakangas
Subject Re: [PATCH] unalias of ACL_SELECT_FOR_UPDATE
Date
Msg-id 49EAD5A6.4010601@enterprisedb.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCH] unalias of ACL_SELECT_FOR_UPDATE  (KaiGai Kohei <kaigai@kaigai.gr.jp>)
List pgsql-hackers
KaiGai Kohei wrote:
> However, ACL_UPDATE and ACL_SELECT_FOR_UPDATE internally shares same bit
> so SE-PostgreSQL cannot discriminate between UPDATE and SELECT FOR UPDATE
> or SHARE.

Why should it discriminate between them?

--   Heikki Linnakangas  EnterpriseDB   http://www.enterprisedb.com


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Re: 8.4b1: Query returning results in different order to 8.3
Next
From: mito
Date:
Subject: Recursive plpgsql function in rule