pg_restore dependencies - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject pg_restore dependencies
Date
Msg-id 49DECFD2.70503@dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: pg_restore dependencies  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
We still have a little work to do on dependencies in parallel 
pg_restore. The current test compares the candidate's locking 
dependencies with those of the running jobs, and allows the candidate is 
there isn't a match. That's not a broad enough test. The candidate will 
block if there's a currently running CREATE INDEX command on the table, 
for example, even though that doesn't require an exclusive lock. That's 
not catastrophic, in that the restore doesn't fail, but it's fairly bad 
because it reduces the achievable parallelism. Josh Berkus observed this 
during testing on a very large restore.

cheers

andrew


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Fujii Masao
Date:
Subject: Re: New trigger option of pg_standby
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Missing mapping in 8.3/tsearch2.sql