Magnus Hagander wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes:
>>> Tom Lane wrote:
>>>> What makes more sense to me is to add a table to encnames.c that
>>>> provides the gettext name of every encoding that we support.
>>> Do you mean a separate table there, or should we add a new column to one
>>> of the existing tables?
>> Whichever seems to make more sense is fine with me. I just don't want
>> add-an-encoding maintenance requirements spread across N different
>> source files.
>
> I was about to start looking at this when that other thread
> (http://archives.postgresql.org//pgsql-hackers/2009-03/msg01270.php)
> started about related issues on other platforms. Seems we should have a
> "coordinated fix" for this, so I'm going to want and see what come sout
> of that one. Unless I'm misunderstanding thigns and they're not related?
I've committed a fairly trivial patch per Peter's suggestion to fix the
other thread's issue. I left the table as is, so whatever refactorings
were planned can now be applied.
-- Heikki Linnakangas EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
