Simon Riggs wrote:
>> Does that answer your question ?
>
> Not really. I want to understand the actual problem with
> idle-in-transaction so we can consider all ways to solve it, rather than
> just focus on one method.
"idle in transaction timeout" feature may be one of the ways.
But I have no specific idea about it now.
--
Tatsuhito Kasahara
kasahara.tatsuhito@oss.ntt.co.jp
