> Why is tbm_add_page() not coded as a simple wrapper around
> tbm_mark_page_lossy()? As coded, it sometimes forces a whole bunch of
> pages *other than* the target page to become lossy too, which I cannot
> see a reason for it to be doing.
[after digging in tidbitmap]
Oops, I was wrong, I supposed that all pages in chunk should be lossy, but it's
true only for chunk page. So, tbm_add_page() should only call
tbm_mark_page_lossy()...
--
Teodor Sigaev E-mail: teodor@sigaev.ru
WWW: http://www.sigaev.ru/
