PATCH: Bug (2009-03:00026) Bug or not? (LIKE INCLUDING DEFAULTS) - Mailing list pgadmin-hackers
From Ashesh Vashi
Subject PATCH: Bug (2009-03:00026) Bug or not? (LIKE INCLUDING DEFAULTS)
Date
Msg-id 49C10074.3040502@enterprisedb.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: 1.10 beta 1  (Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org>)
Responses Re: PATCH: Bug (2009-03:00026) Bug or not? (LIKE INCLUDING DEFAULTS)  (Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume@lelarge.info>)
Re: PATCH: Bug (2009-03:00026) Bug or not? (LIKE
INCLUDING DEFAULTS)  (Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org>)
List pgadmin-hackers
[Changed the subject line.]

Hi Guillaume/Dave,

Please find the patch for the same.
I have come up with this solution for the bug.

Thanks Guillaume for your suggestions and help.
It helped a lot to come up with this solution.

As I could not find a direct way to integrate the new sql with the existing
sql for the ShowDependents and ShowDependency, (as per Dave's suggestion) we
added few lines at the end of these function for the solution.

Dave Page wrote:
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 10:06 AM, Ashesh Vashi
<ashesh.vashi@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
wow - Thanks.
I think - this gives me enough idea to work on.
Good to see you two figuring this out - I love it when a plan comes together :-p

I'm going to go on and prepare the beta. This bug has been around for
years and never got noticed before. Another few days or so won't kill
us. 
--
Thanks & Regards,
Ashesh Vashi

EnterpriseDB INDIA: http://www.enterprisedb.com

pgadmin-hackers by date:

Previous
From: svn@pgadmin.org
Date:
Subject: SVN Commit by dpage: r7726 - trunk/pgadmin3/docs/en_US
Next
From: Guillaume Lelarge
Date:
Subject: Re: PATCH: Bug (2009-03:00026) Bug or not? (LIKE INCLUDING DEFAULTS)