Thomas Kellerer wrote:
>>
>> change number to numeric, and varchar2 to char and you'll likely be
>> good.
>>
>>
>>
> My guess would have been that varchar is the equivalent to varchar2
>
> char does a blank padding and is different in behaviour to varchar (as
> it is in Oracle)
geez, yeah, what you said! BTDT, and had the t-shirt. i think ill
have another beer now.
