Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>
>> Worst case, we could say that parallel restore isn't supported on
>> mingw. I'm not entirely sure why we bother with that platform at all...
>
> I think you're confusing it with cygwin ...
Yeah. Much as I hate working around the quirks of mingw, I definitely
think we need to keep that platform.
(yes, cygwin is another story, but let's not repeat that discussion now)
//Magnus
