Re: Weird quirk with pg_dump of complex types - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Josh Berkus
Subject Re: Weird quirk with pg_dump of complex types
Date
Msg-id 49A77D46.5020104@agliodbs.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Weird quirk with pg_dump of complex types  (Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>)
Responses Re: Weird quirk with pg_dump of complex types
List pgsql-bugs
Jeff,

> In the general case though, for any object that refers to multiple other
> objects, I don't see any way around explicit schema qualification. I
> suppose it could be smart and say "foo_type is unique in my search path,
> so I don't need to schema-qualify it".

Yeah, but for most other objects "public" is also excluded as well as
pg_catalog.  For CREATE TYPE, "public" is explicit.

> Have you considered working from the "custom" format rather than text?
> I'm not sure whether it solves your problem, but I think it provides the
> most information.

--Josh Berkus

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Jeff Davis
Date:
Subject: Re: Weird quirk with pg_dump of complex types
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Weird quirk with pg_dump of complex types