Re: speaking of 8.4... - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Ron Mayer
Subject Re: speaking of 8.4...
Date
Msg-id 49A728C2.3000208@cheapcomplexdevices.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: speaking of 8.4...  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
Responses Re: speaking of 8.4...
List pgsql-general
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-02-26 at 15:27 -0800, Ron Mayer wrote:
>> Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>>> On Fri, 2009-02-27 at 10:19 +1300, Tim Uckun wrote:
>>>>
>>>> 8.4 was scheduled to be released march 1. ...
>>
>> I do notice that the Press FAQ with it's Q4 2008 guess
>> is even more optimistic ...
>
> Wow that must have been written some time ago I don't think anyone
> thought we would hit that date in any recent (say last 6-8 months).
>

That press FAQ page is often sadly amusing.

Back in Jan 2008 that same page stated that 8.3 "would" come out
in July 2007:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-advocacy/2008-01/msg00235.php

But that's not nearly as sad as the Chinese FAQs that state that
the latest version of Postgres is 8.2.1 or 8.2.3 depending on
whether you prefer traditional or simplified writing styles.
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs.FAQ_chinese_simp.html
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs.FAQ_chinese_trad.html
And for german speakers, their newest is 8.2.5
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs.FAQ_german.html
Basically for all the languages you get a different "lateset"
release.

Surely these FAQ entries are doing more harm than good.

Can we please just update all of these to link to some page
where the actual latest version is instead; and replace the
forward-looking expectations with something that is less
misleading?


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Scott Marlowe
Date:
Subject: Re: Connection refused (0x0000274D/10061).
Next
From: "Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
Subject: Re: speaking of 8.4...