Re: dissimilar drives in Raid10 , does it make difference ? - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Craig Ringer
Subject Re: dissimilar drives in Raid10 , does it make difference ?
Date
Msg-id 499684CF.5060203@postnewspapers.com.au
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: dissimilar drives in Raid10 , does it make difference ?  (Matthew Wakeling <matthew@flymine.org>)
List pgsql-performance
Matthew Wakeling wrote:

> In fact, it is recommended that two different types of drives are used.
> That way, if there's a mass failure of a whole batch of drives from one
> particular vendor, you don't lose all your data.

Don't think this is just paranoia, either. I've had it happen to me
SEVERAL times - either a second drive fails before I can replace the
first, or the second drive in a pair fails during rebuild onto the
replacement. I use regular RAID scrubbing, so this isn't just a case of
undetected media errors.

Nothing beats good backups.

--
Craig Ringer

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: "Kevin Grittner"
Date:
Subject: Re: I/O increase after upgrading to 8.3.5
Next
From: Craig Ringer
Date:
Subject: Re: I/O increase after upgrading to 8.3.5