> At this point I like Merlin's proposal of a third parameter value to
> PQinitSSL the best.
I'm not opposed to it, although I don't think it is as clean as a new
function.
>
> Also, this definition feels a bit wrong --- it's not possible for
> all four cases to be valid, is it?
>
Yes it is.
PQinitSSLExtended(0, 0); // don't init anything, PQinitSSL(0)
PQinitSSLExtended(1, 0); // init ssl, don't init crypto
PQinitSSLExtended(0, 1); // don't init ssl, init crypto
PQinitSSLExtended(1, 1); // init both, default behavior, PQinitSSL(1)
--
Andrew Chernow
eSilo, LLC
every bit counts
http://www.esilo.com/
