Re: Updates of SE-PostgreSQL 8.4devel patches (r1530) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Joshua Brindle
Subject Re: Updates of SE-PostgreSQL 8.4devel patches (r1530)
Date
Msg-id 49957EB9.9000607@manicmethod.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Updates of SE-PostgreSQL 8.4devel patches (r1530)  (KaiGai Kohei <kaigai@ak.jp.nec.com>)
Responses Re: Updates of SE-PostgreSQL 8.4devel patches (r1530)
List pgsql-hackers
KaiGai Kohei wrote:
> KaiGai Kohei wrote:
>> The series of SE-PostgreSQL patches are updated:
>> [1/5] 
>> http://sepgsql.googlecode.com/files/sepostgresql-sepgsql-8.4devel-3-r1530.patch 
>>
>> [2/5] 
>> http://sepgsql.googlecode.com/files/sepostgresql-utils-8.4devel-3-r1530.patch 
>>
>> [3/5] 
>> http://sepgsql.googlecode.com/files/sepostgresql-policy-8.4devel-3-r1530.patch 
>>
>> [4/5] 
>> http://sepgsql.googlecode.com/files/sepostgresql-docs-8.4devel-3-r1530.patch 
>>
>> [5/5] 
>> http://sepgsql.googlecode.com/files/sepostgresql-tests-8.4devel-3-r1530.patch 
>>
> 
> BTW, what is the current status of revewing the patches?
> Is it necessary to wait for a few days more?
> 
> If you have anything unclear, please feel free to ask me anything.
> 

Yes, what was the decision about 8.4? Is this going to make it in?

> Thanks,
> 
>> - List of updates:
>> * These are rebased to the latest CVS HEAD because of conflictions.
>>   - The src/include/catalog/pg_proc.h got a confliction due to the
>>     newly added SQL functions.
>>   - The src/bin/pg_dump/pg_dump.c got a confliction due to the stuff
>>     to dump "toast_reloptions".
>> * bugfix: An incorrect procedure entry for sepgsql_server_getcon().
>> * cleanup: A strange error message in testcases.
>>
>> Rest of parts are unchanged.
>>
>> Please comment anything.
>>
>> Thanks,
> 



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Kenneth Marshall
Date:
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] GIST versus GIN indexes for intarrays
Next
From: Andrew Chernow
Date:
Subject: Re: PQinitSSL broken in some use casesf