Re: Intel SSD - Mailing list pgsql-general

From John R Pierce
Subject Re: Intel SSD
Date
Msg-id 4992767E.6020402@hogranch.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Intel SSD  (Sebastian Böhm <seb@exse.net>)
Responses Re: Intel SSD
List pgsql-general
Sebastian Böhm wrote:
> I consider buying one of these Intel SSDs for my Database (MLC).
> .....
> currently I have a lot of small random reads/writes causing heavy iowait.

how many r/s and w/s in `iostat -x 5` while your database is humming are
you seeing now?    Thats the single key performance factor in disk bound
database IO.  Caches can reduce the r/s requirements but the writes have
to go to disk if you want data integrity.   ok, a raid controller with
battery back cache configured for writeback can accelerate the writes by
a lot too.

a desktop 7200 rpm SATA drive will saturate at under 100 IO ops/sec max
with the typical 8kbyte random blocks of a database, while a 15k server
drive can sustain 200 io/sec, and a raid 1+0 can hit several times more
(I've seen sustained 200/s on each of 4 15k spindles) while still using
normal hard disks.   Those intel SSDs are supposed to be good for 1000
or so IOP/sec if I remember correctly... (of course, in a mirror, you
have to half the aggregated writes for the true number of useful random
writes)







pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Craig Ringer
Date:
Subject: Re: creating tables using a file
Next
From: "A. Kretschmer"
Date:
Subject: Re: creating tables using a file