Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> Can someone comment on this?
>
> Looks like a horrible hack to me. Recoding stuff to the client encoding
> in the server outside the existing recoding mechanism looks pretty evil
> to me.
> Plus, it does not address the problem of what happens to
> messages sent before this, it just moves the point of "before" a bit
> earlier for some special cases.
>
> I think we have discussed more proper solutions earlier in this thread.
> IMO the best approach would be for the client to include the client
> encoding in the startup package.
??? My patch exactly references the client_encoding included in
the startup message.
regards,
Hiroshi Inoue
