Re: Pet Peeves? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Guy Rouillier
Subject Re: Pet Peeves?
Date
Msg-id 4989D25B.7020303@burntmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Pet Peeves?  ("Karsten Hilbert" <Karsten.Hilbert@gmx.net>)
Responses Re: Pet Peeves?
List pgsql-general
Karsten Hilbert wrote:
>>> Craig, what kind of "events" are you thinking about?  Triggers are
>>> already pieces of code that run upon "certain events", namely insert,
>>> update or delete events.  What others do you have in mind?
>> That's a good point, actually. I can't think of much you can't do with a
>> trigger (SECURITY DEFINER if necessary) on a table. Not thinking straight.
>
> I would find ON CONNECT/DISCONNECT triggers very useful. Probably
> this is more similar to database-wide assertions.

But a job scheduler would not help with that.  Perhaps you intended your
comment to fall into the "pet peeves" bucket rather than the "job
scheduler" bucket.

--
Guy Rouillier

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Chris.Ellis@shropshire.gov.uk
Date:
Subject: Re: field with Password
Next
From: John DeSoi
Date:
Subject: Re: Pet Peeves?