nconway@klamath.dyndns.org (Neil Conway) writes:
> Regarding the syntax for EXECUTE, it occurs to me that it could be made
> to be more similar to the PREPARE syntax -- i.e.
> PREPARE foo(text, int) AS ...;
> EXECUTE foo('a', 1);
> (rather than EXECUTE USING -- the effect being that prepared statements
> now look more like function calls on a syntactical level, which I think
> is okay.)
Hmm, maybe *too* much like a function call. Is there any risk of a
conflict with syntax that we might want to use to invoke stored
procedures? If not, this is fine with me.
regards, tom lane
