Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> I agree that pgstats is not ideal (we've said this from the very
> beginning), but I doubt that updating pg_class is the answer; you'd be
> generating thousands of dead tuples there.
>
But we already do update pg_class after vacuum -- in vac_update_relstats().
Hmm, that performs a heap_inplace_update() ... I assume that this is cheap,
but have no idea as if it is suitable for the purpouse.
regards,
Martin
