> I notice you added a fillfactor reloption in ginoptions, but does it
> really make sense? I recall removing it because the original code
> contained a comment that says "this is here because default_reloptions
> wants it, but it has no effect".
I didn't change a recognition of fillfactor value, although GIN doesn't use it
for now.
--
Teodor Sigaev E-mail: teodor@sigaev.ru
WWW: http://www.sigaev.ru/
