Re: FWD: Re: Updated backslash consistency patch - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Josh Berkus
Subject Re: FWD: Re: Updated backslash consistency patch
Date
Msg-id 4970E386.7030104@agliodbs.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: FWD: Re: Updated backslash consistency patch  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: FWD: Re: Updated backslash consistency patch  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tom,

> which means that Robert's complaint about treating no-pattern
> differently from pattern falls to the ground.  It's exactly what
> \d has done for years, and nobody has complained about that.

Just because they haven't voiced loud complaints doesn't mean that they 
haven't been *confused* by it.  I know that I've been confused by the 
behaviour of \d before, which is why I pretty much never use it.

I think a search of -general and -newbie would be educational on the 
number of people who are confused by the shortcuts.

Or, to put it another way, the fact that we screwed up in the past is 
hardly a justification to do it in the future.

--Josh



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: FWD: Re: Updated backslash consistency patch
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: FWD: Re: Updated backslash consistency patch